From: | Peter Padua Krauss <ppkrauss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | voting to the xslt_process() need |
Date: | 2011-11-07 17:10:46 |
Message-ID: | CAHEREtuJNOg+VKsNwgO98wFxFENWaqSkLWfuQ_WiXiCciHOdVA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I vote to see the contrib/xml2's xslt_process() build-in function (only
xslt_process)
moved into PostgreSQL core.
----
Database servers can offer some "load balancing" with another CPUs, like a
PHP server...
I have in mind some main examples:
* If database server not process XSLT, the *balance* is lost (for PHP
processing DOM and XSLT).
* If database server not process XSLT, a lot of *traffic* and not-elegant *
code* is necessary.
* If a "XML framework" is developed for "SQL-side", like Oracle-APEX, a lot
of *extra-workaround* is necessary to build the framework (with external
XML processing).
* ...
Another big problem is the *lack of xQuery*, them the *internal processing
of XSLT is a important workaround*.
Several "serious XML projects" are being lost to Oracle, only because of
this lack of xQuey and XSLT support.
PS: the main XPath libraries implements also XSLT; PostgreSQL core have
XPath, to add XSLT is only a little more.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2011-11-07 17:20:18 | Re: [v9.2] Object access hooks with arguments support (v1) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-07 16:59:47 | Re: unaccent extension missing some accents |