From: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ..SET PUBLICATION <no name> refresh is not throwing error. |
Date: | 2017-05-27 00:13:08 |
Message-ID: | CAHE3wgjp4WPcBzxVh2Y1f_3y9X8tOTuL8cPi6zXpLswdXwPzQA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2017-05-26 17:58 GMT-03:00 Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> On 5/24/17 15:38, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> >>> I wonder if we actually need the SKIP REFRESH syntax, there is the
> >>> "REFRESH [ WITH ... ]" when user wants to refresh, so if REFRESH is not
> >>> specified, we can just behave as if SKIP REFRESH was used, it's not
> like
> >>> there is 3rd possible behavior.
> >>
> >> Attached patch does exactly that.
> >
> > And of course I forgot to update docs...
>
> Do we want not-refreshing to be the default behavior?
It is a different behavior from the initial proposal. However, we
fortunately have ALTER SUBSCRIPTION foo REFRESH PUBLICATION and can refresh
later. Also, if "refresh" is more popular than "skip", it is just a small
word in the command. That's the price we pay to avoid ambiguity that the
previous syntax had.At least I think Petr's proposal is less confusing than
mine (my proposal maintains current behavior but can cause some confusion).
--
Euler Taveira Timbira -
http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
<http://www.timbira.com.br>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-05-27 00:29:56 | Re: ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ..SET PUBLICATION <no name> refresh is not throwing error. |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2017-05-26 23:35:56 | Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months |