Re: Fix doc bug in logical replication.

From: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix doc bug in logical replication.
Date: 2019-04-08 23:19:12
Message-ID: CAHE3wgjHfipRKCp4OYhWGPCJD5b4AV6btyx+FLNKLGZosuS-_A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em seg, 8 de abr de 2019 às 19:38, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> escreveu:
>
> I noticed that the docs currently state "A different order of columns
> in the target table is allowed, but the column types have to match."
> This is untrue, as you can replicate between any two data types as
> long as the data can be coerced into the right format on the
> subscriber. Attached is a patch that attempts to clarify this, and
> provides some additional wordsmithing of that section. Patch is
> against head but the nature of the patch would apply to the docs for
> 11 and 10, which both have the incorrect information as well, even if
> the patch itself does not.
>
I would say it is inaccurate because the actual instruction works. I
agree that your words are an improvement but it lacks a comment on the
slot_[store|modify]_cstrings.

--
Euler Taveira Timbira -
http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2019-04-08 23:38:11 Re: Sparse bit set data structure
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2019-04-08 22:42:40 Re: change password_encryption default to scram-sha-256?