| From: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, eldmannen(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
| Date: | 2019-03-20 17:25:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAHE3wgip89NYAqQMJvi-JfpTuaoT68YUfrin0AB_cLkp8XyZ-A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-pkg-debian |
Em qua, 20 de mar de 2019 às 11:39, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> escreveu:
>
> +1. As one of third party PostgreSQL tool developers, I am afraid
> changing names of PostgreSQL commands would give us lots of pain: for
> example checking PostgreSQL version to decide to use command "foo" not
> "pg_foo".
>
createdb, dropdb, createuser, dropuser, reindexdb are binaries that
confuse most newbies. Which tool is theses binaries from? The names
does not give a hint. How often those confusing name tools are used?
AFAICS a graphical tool or psql is used to create roles and databases.
psql -c "stmt" can replace createdb, dropdb, createuser and dropuser.
What about deprecate them (and remove after a support cycle)?
--
Euler Taveira Timbira -
http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2019-03-20 17:32:10 | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2019-03-20 17:08:53 | Re: Add exclusive backup deprecation notes to documentation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2019-03-20 17:32:10 | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
| Previous Message | Fred .Flintstone | 2019-03-20 15:30:33 | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |