Re: BUG #15067: Documentation or behaviour bug with autovacuum thresholds?

From: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
To: greg(dot)clough(at)ipreo(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #15067: Documentation or behaviour bug with autovacuum thresholds?
Date: 2018-03-01 00:21:51
Message-ID: CAHE3wgiY_RZbNxc+ygZMJqjFf-AS=tbQAabM_8ZwqDaXdcML=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

2018-02-14 11:44 GMT-03:00 PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>:
> I think there is a documentation bug in the Autovacuum section:
>
No, there isn't.

> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/routine-vacuuming.html#AUTOVACUUM
>
If you read the documentation again you will note the following setence:

... since the last VACUUM exceeds the "vacuum threshold", the table is vacuumed.

"exceed" means "greater than". Hence, documentation is accurate.

--
Euler Taveira Timbira -
http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-03-01 00:55:10 Re: Conflicting declarations for b64_encode etc. on Solaris 11.4 Beta
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-02-28 23:37:27 Re: Conflicting declarations for b64_encode etc. on Solaris 11.4 Beta