From: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: improving wraparound behavior |
Date: | 2019-05-04 03:11:32 |
Message-ID: | CAHE3wghEiwLCz=5N+2ndOV1G7NZHmS2nRhD=b6zyPa=N_--_SA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em sex, 3 de mai de 2019 às 17:27, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> escreveu:
>
> HINT: Commit or roll back old prepared transactions, drop stale
> replication slots, or kill long-running sessions.
> Ensure that autovacuum is progressing, or run a manual database-wide VACUUM.
>
First of all, +1 for this patch. But after reading this email, I
couldn't resist to expose an idea about stale XID horizon. [A cup of
tea...] I realized that there is no automatic way to recover from old
prepared transactions, stale replication slots or even long-running
sessions when we have a wraparound situation. Isn't it the case to add
a parameter that recover from stale XID horizon? I mean if we reach a
critical situation (xidStopLimit), free resource that is preventing
the XID advance (and hope autovacuum have some time to prevent a
stop-assigning-xids situation). The situation is analogous to OOM
killer that it kills some processes that are starving resources.
--
Euler Taveira Timbira -
http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-05-04 03:56:24 | Re: First-draft release notes for back branches are up |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2019-05-04 03:08:44 | Re: improving wraparound behavior |