| From: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Different table schema in logical replication crashes |
| Date: | 2017-04-17 12:47:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAHE3wgh9qLmjoOC4S5YO=FHq4C664Ny+n0qZbBpkJybdb7zeZQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2017-04-14 22:36 GMT-03:00 Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> I tried something bit different which seems cleaner to me - use the
> pstate->r_table instead of ad-hock locally made up range table and fill
> that using standard addRangeTableEntryForRelation. Both in tablesync and
> in DoCopy instead of the old coding.
>
Patch works fine. However, I don't see any documentation about supporting
different schemas for logical replication. Is it an oversight?
--
Euler Taveira Timbira -
http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
<http://www.timbira.com.br>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stas Kelvich | 2017-04-17 13:59:35 | Re: Logical replication - TRAP: FailedAssertion in pgstat.c |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-04-17 12:46:42 | Re: Re: logical replication and PANIC during shutdown checkpoint in publisher |