From: | Venkata Balaji Nagothi <vbnpgc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Matthew Chambers <mchambers(at)wetafx(dot)co(dot)nz> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org >> PG-General Mailing List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: bg writer went away after reload |
Date: | 2014-03-10 23:03:05 |
Message-ID: | CAHBAh5s_oBcLuMH9WzaTcgtgSmd_6FCPwqwKfShDoOpwH8t-QQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Matthew Chambers <mchambers(at)wetafx(dot)co(dot)nz>wrote:
> Hi, just wondering if this is normal, DB is operating just fine.
>
> I upped bgwriter_lru_maxpages to 200 and issued a reload. Normally, I'd
> see the bgwriter constantly churning as one of my main I/O using processes,
> but now I have:
>
> postgres: wal writer process
> postgres: checkpointer process
>
> The wal writer seems to have taken over. Does this make sense?
>
What WAL writer does is completely different from the way bgwriter
functions. These two critical background processes of PostgreSQL performing
independent I/O operations independently.One cannot take over another.
which version of Postgres is this ?
Do you see anything in the Postgres logs ? Do you see any message which
indicates that reloading of the new configuration in postgresql.conf file
was successful ?
Venkata Balaji N
Sr. Database Administrator
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matthew Chambers | 2014-03-10 23:32:48 | Re: bg writer went away after reload |
Previous Message | Brian Crowell | 2014-03-10 21:49:28 | Re: Recovering from failed transaction |