From: | Shaheed Haque <shaheedhaque(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general list <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Content of pg_publication using a local connection versus network connection? |
Date: | 2025-01-28 18:08:23 |
Message-ID: | CAHAc2jcACPpMv4Xzk-2xMVvAioREkvPLMFyg3Y3vAzRtV6j=GQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks for the confirmation.
On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 at 18:06, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:
>
>
> On 1/28/25 10:02 AM, Shaheed Haque wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Based on the nudge from Adrian, I think I am now trying to connect to
> > the correct/same database through both the original
> > login-to-EC2-host-then-use-psql-to-RDS and then
> > setup-SSHTunnel-then-connect-via-psycopg-over-tunnel.
> >
> > The connect-via-psycopg-over-tunnel bit currently fails. Obviously, that
> > is almost certainly a bug in my code, but I am aware that the Postgres'
> > HBA setup is capable of distinguishing local logins from remote logins,
> > so I wanted to check if Postgres' login security can similarly
> > distinguish between a (remote) psql login and a (remote) psycopg login?
>
> They both use libpq so I doubt it.
>
> >
> > Thanks, Shaheed
> >
> >
> >
> > On
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2025-01-28 18:14:40 | Re: Content of pg_publication using a local connection versus network connection? |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2025-01-28 18:06:55 | Re: Content of pg_publication using a local connection versus network connection? |