From: | Gregory Haase <haaseg(at)onefreevoice(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: json datatype and table bloat? |
Date: | 2013-10-29 21:55:32 |
Message-ID: | CAHA6QFSvFWXw44X3=W18xF7OY75wyq97gRJtCxuFW5d0BUgZYg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom is correct: Vacuum verbose shows that their is an associated toast
table. Neither the check_postgres.pl script or the query on
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Show_database_bloat appear to take this
into consideration. Both rely on null_frac and avg_width from pg_stats to
estimate how big the table should be. I'm not sure how you would factor the
toast table into that estimate.
-G
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Gregory Haase <haaseg(at)onefreevoice(dot)com> writes:
> > I've isolated the problem to the json field not showing up in pg_stats,
> > which affects the calculation of the avg row size in the bloat query.
>
> > I'm not sure if this is a json issue or some other kind of issue.
>
> Possibly your "bloat query" is failing to consider the toast table
> associated with this table? If the json values are large they'd
> mostly be in the toast table not the main table.
>
> (It's unfortunate that VACUUM FULL doesn't tell you about what's
> in the toast table. I'd try just VACUUM VERBOSE here, without the
> FULL, to get more info.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tim Kane | 2013-10-30 10:32:20 | Undocumented feature? USING INDEX TABLESPACE |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-10-29 21:05:39 | Re: json datatype and table bloat? |