| From: | Jeffrey Walton <noloader(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: When will trusted PL/Python be supported? |
| Date: | 2023-06-27 16:22:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAH8yC8nkASfmeNGNmVVxyZHtW8G9mokZQevp9Vqt9aRz8kgJ6A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 12:17 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
> > On 6/27/23 04:46, Bowen Shi wrote:
> >> I'd like to know is supporting trusted PL/Python still in the
> >> schedule? What is the reason for the current lack of support, and do
> >> we have any relevant email discussion?
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20030525224833.GO31407%40tummy.com
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/Pine.LNX.4.44.0306182125590.17051-100000%40penguin.theopalgroup.com
>
> There's been a little bit of discussion of using RestrictedPython:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/9d1f8d830808041008v50104fd8p6181d5ddce85a6a%40mail.gmail.com
>
> but it doesn't seem to have gone anywhere.
Off-topic, but I am amazed folks like Tom and Adrian remember those
conversations and can actually find them in the archives.
Jeff
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ben Chobot | 2023-06-27 16:32:24 | Re: typical active table count? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-06-27 16:17:09 | Re: When will trusted PL/Python be supported? |