| From: | Jeffrey Walton <noloader(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Giovanni Biscontini <biscontini(dot)g(at)es2000(dot)it> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Best Open Source OS for Postgresql |
| Date: | 2023-02-01 16:05:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAH8yC8kWjctkcaYoHQOdv43CTA4e0xvmL1LSLggtiWMMtR_rMQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 3:03 AM Giovanni Biscontini <biscontini(dot)g(at)es2000(dot)it>
wrote:
> We're looking for a Open Source alternative to Rhel for our VM server
> dedicated to Postgresql (14->15) installations. We're testing Alma, Rocky,
> and Oracle distributions as they're compatible with Rhel package systems.
> Can you share your experience on a similar choice?
>
Let me throw my choice into the mix... Fedora Server.
The benefits of Fedora Server is modern software. Every six months, you get
the latest release of nearly all packages.
The downside is, you lose API/ABI compatibility. Fedora Server is always
moving forward with the latest packages, including past ABI/API breaks.
Another downside is, you run dnf-system-upgrade (
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/) every
six months. It is like Ubuntu's do-release-upgrade.
The real upside to modern software is, you get all the bug fixes, including
latent bugs that should have CVE's associated with them but were
misclassified. For a discussion, see Greg KH's talk at
https://thenewstack.io/design-system-can-update-greg-kroah-hartman-linux-security/
.
Jeff
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2023-02-01 16:25:40 | Re: Best Open Source OS for Postgresql |
| Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2023-02-01 16:04:20 | Re: A Small psql Suggestion |