| From: | Jim Vanns <jvanns(at)ilm(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: VACUUM on temp table blocks VACUUM on another... |
| Date: | 2024-08-01 20:00:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAH7vdhNsEpRAhSEa4-KbLoRyjecixbnOqZa0_+yqR_t-oXKa1Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I don't at hand, but the query I used to identify this was;
SELECT state, pid, pg_blocking_pids(pid), query
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE backend_type='client backend';
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 20:12, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Jim Vanns <jvanns(at)ilm(dot)com> writes:
> > I have two sessions, each creating a temporary table of the same name -
> > 'foobar'. Why would a vacuum of 'foobar' from one session block the
> vacuum
> > of 'foobar' in the other session?
>
> That's fairly hard to believe. Can you provide a self-contained test
> case?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Jim Vanns
Principal Production Engineer
Industrial Light & Magic, London
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2024-08-01 21:26:40 | Re: VACUUM on temp table blocks VACUUM on another... |
| Previous Message | Jim Vanns | 2024-08-01 19:58:06 | Re: VACUUM on temp table blocks VACUUM on another... |