From: | Jim Vanns <jvanns(at)ilm(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: VACUUM on temp table blocks VACUUM on another... |
Date: | 2024-08-01 22:13:43 |
Message-ID: | CAH7vdhN9puiE2nUv0vyzYP_d_A9KXoiyt00KHV-Fv4egHqCS4A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
PG 15.4
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 22:27, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> PG 15.0 or 15.7?
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 3:58 PM Jim Vanns <jvanns(at)ilm(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, PG15.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 20:25, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/1/24 12:12, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> > Jim Vanns <jvanns(at)ilm(dot)com> writes:
>>> >> I have two sessions, each creating a temporary table of the same name
>>> -
>>> >> 'foobar'. Why would a vacuum of 'foobar' from one session block the
>>> vacuum
>>> >> of 'foobar' in the other session?
>>> >
>>> > That's fairly hard to believe. Can you provide a self-contained test
>>> > case?
>>>
>>> Would also be nice to know what version of Postgres and where you are
>>> running the server?
>>>
>>> >
>>> > regards, tom lane
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Adrian Klaver
>>> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jim Vanns
>> Principal Production Engineer
>> Industrial Light & Magic, London
>>
>
--
Jim Vanns
Principal Production Engineer
Industrial Light & Magic, London
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2024-08-01 22:31:43 | Re: VACUUM on temp table blocks VACUUM on another... |
Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2024-08-01 21:26:40 | Re: VACUUM on temp table blocks VACUUM on another... |