| From: | Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope(at)jackdb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Mark Rotteveel <mark(at)lawinegevaar(dot)nl>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Maven Artifact JDK Suffix |
| Date: | 2016-01-15 13:45:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAH7T-ar_O5EVxB-xeoYqHrbpu_gH9uqzsrTokUxut+nMmxfXDA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov <
sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The reason is Maven sorts strings literally, thus java10 would be
> collated before jre9
I don't think it will matter as the release version (ex: 9.4-1234) is
prefixed to the full version anyway Newer versions of any JRE would appear
"newer" than older versions of a later JRE (i.e. 9.4-1400-jre6 >
9.4-1300-jre8).
Using two digits won't fix anything and just looks odd compared to how JRE
versions are generally referred.
Regards,
-- Sehrope Sarkuni
Founder & CEO | JackDB, Inc. | https://www.jackdb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2016-01-15 13:50:33 | Re: Maven Artifact JDK Suffix |
| Previous Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2016-01-15 13:38:49 | Re: Maven Artifact JDK Suffix |