Re: Are the estimates made for number of pages accurate

From: Sai Sadashiva Kundurmutt <saisadashiva2000(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are the estimates made for number of pages accurate
Date: 2024-02-26 03:59:04
Message-ID: CAH6hFGKBBqKX7HSi9+guMUcn7h_ELQUQKkwCu3N8ug-=xi02+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Thank you for clearing my doubts.

On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 at 22:11, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Sai Sadashiva Kundurmutt <saisadashiva2000(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I wanted to know whether the numbers calculated by ANALYZE for number of
> > pages are exact(the relpages field in pg_class).
>
> If memory serves, relpages is accurate as of the time of the last
> VACUUM or ANALYZE on the table, but of course it could be arbitrarily
> out of date later.
>
> > I had the impression that
> > it is exact because during random sampling the number of pages is
> assumed
> > to be known.
>
> What makes you think that? And even more to the point, what makes
> you think that we'd rely on relpages for such a purpose? I'd expect
> a fresh RelationGetNumberOfBlocks call in any scan that had a need
> to know the table size.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message SOzcn 2024-02-26 08:43:48 Google Cloud Maintenance
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2024-02-26 00:02:50 Re: Another way to do audit in DML operations in PostgreSQL >= 14