From: | Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. |
Date: | 2015-08-10 04:36:08 |
Message-ID: | CAH2L28ug6GDWTCj_U5WhNZTHFjbr8tDiPL6UHnLbjiy6YnO7gA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
>Say, 6 bigint counters, 6 float8
>counters, and 3 strings up to 80 characters each. So we have a
>fixed-size chunk of shared memory per backend, and each backend that
>wants to expose progress information can fill in those fields however
>it likes, and we expose the results.
>This would be sorta like the way pg_statistic works: the same columns
>can be used for different purposes depending on what estimator will be
>used to access them.
After thinking more on this suggestion, I came up with following generic
structure which can be used to store progress of any command per backend in
shared memory.
Struct PgBackendProgress
{
int32 *counter[COMMAND_NUM_SLOTS];
float8 *counter_float[COMMAND_NUM_SLOTS];
char *progress_message[COMMAND_NUM_SLOTS];
}
COMMAND_NUM_SLOTS will define maximum number of slots(phases) for any
command.
Progress of command will be measured using progress of each phase in
command.
For some command the number of phases can be singular and rest of the slots
will be NULL.
Each phase will report n integer counters, n float counters and a progress
message.
For some phases , any of the above fields can be NULL.
For VACUUM , there can 3 phases as discussed in the earlier mails.
Phase 1. Report 2 integer counters: heap pages scanned and total heap
pages, 1 float counter: percentage_complete and progress message.
Phase 2. Report 2 integer counters: index pages scanned and total index
pages(across all indexes) and progress message.
Phase 3. 1 integer counter: heap pages vacuumed.
This structure can be accessed by statistics collector to display progress
via new view.
Thank you,
Rahila Syed
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-08-10 05:09:38 | Re: Priority table or Cache table |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2015-08-10 04:04:33 | Re: [patch] A \pivot command for psql |