| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Delay commit status checks until freezing executes. |
| Date: | 2023-01-04 05:50:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WznzR6+i9kq-=EGQhLFbw+eE0+zRxi+5_2LubyUKkEyjpw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 8:29 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> I find this astonishing. Why isn't there a prominent comment that
> advertises that TransactionIdDidAbort() just doesn't work reliably?
I pushed a fix for this now.
We should add a comment about this issue to TransactionIdDidAbort()
header comments, but I didn't do that part yet.
Thanks for the report.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-01-04 06:33:25 | Re: pgsql: Delay commit status checks until freezing executes. |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2023-01-04 05:49:13 | pgsql: Check that xmax didn't commit in freeze check. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-04 05:55:31 | Re: [PATCH] Improve ability to display optimizer analysis using OPTIMIZER_DEBUG |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2023-01-04 05:31:25 | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |