Re: PG11 Parallel Thanks!!

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Jason Ralph <jralph(at)affinitysolutions(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG11 Parallel Thanks!!
Date: 2019-10-03 05:26:00
Message-ID: CAH2-Wznz4dVySDVLSMkUPG=+qsVT7JuO17eYeDA0hcUhFe1gQw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:41 AM Jason Ralph <jralph(at)affinitysolutions(dot)com> wrote:
> Since pg11 on both the target and source, the run time has decreased a lot, I chalk it up to the parallel index creations in pg11 which was a very time consuming process on pg9.3.
> The process has finished almost 10 hours earlier than pg93. So thank you for your hard work and dedication to this awesome piece of software.

How long did it take on 9.3?

I am the author of the parallel CREATE INDEX feature. It's good to get
feedback like this.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arnaud L. 2019-10-03 06:51:28 psql \copy hanging
Previous Message raf 2019-10-03 05:10:37 Re: Users, Roles and Connection Pooling