Re: Standardizing how pg_waldump presents recovery conflict XID cutoffs

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Standardizing how pg_waldump presents recovery conflict XID cutoffs
Date: 2022-11-17 00:34:36
Message-ID: CAH2-WznrNJXyhwMCQ1-2PFDaG-k5VHwOyv9meHsDFofGJ79yUA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 4:25 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > Anyway, worth calling this out directly in these comments IMV. We're
> > addressing two closely related things that assign opposite meanings to
> > InvalidTransactionId, which is rather confusing.
>
> It makes sense to call this out, but I'd
> s/snapshotConflictHorizon format XIDs/cutoff with snapshotConflictHorizon semantics/
>
> or such?

WFM.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-11-17 00:53:17 Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)
Previous Message Andrey Borodin 2022-11-17 00:27:06 Re: libpq compression (part 2)