Re: TRACE_SORT defined by default

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: TRACE_SORT defined by default
Date: 2019-04-25 20:56:56
Message-ID: CAH2-WznqsdppJFjpgogA0ctpKhA8y2ctdEHAK8K2kb7XxncKow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:56 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Well, I was suggesting that we ought to consider the alternative of
> making it *not* always compiled, and Jeff was pushing back on that.

Right. Sorry.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-04-25 21:03:09 Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-04-25 20:56:33 Re: TRACE_SORT defined by default