From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski <me(at)komzpa(dot)net>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Yet another fast GiST build |
Date: | 2021-01-17 22:35:18 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-WznnqS7HcPhT5F-vFY82iBe4c6eboKB044Tc1N2bWRzuXw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:50 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I noticed that gist_page_items() thinks it can hold inter_call_data->rel
> open across a series of calls. That's completely unsafe: the executor
> might not run the call series to completion (see LIMIT), resulting in
> relcache leak complaints.
It also has the potential to run into big problems should the user
input a raw page image with an regclass-argument-incompatible tuple
descriptor. Maybe that's okay (this is a tool for experts), but it
certainly is a consideration.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2021-01-17 22:42:59 | Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-01-17 22:22:13 | Re: pg_collation_actual_version() ERROR: cache lookup failed for collation 123 |