From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: broken tables on hot standby after migration on PostgreSQL 16 (3x times last month) |
Date: | 2024-05-17 17:25:21 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-WznmVB78j_AYcoyDNDhMhR0gxRq34pyBMiDBbY0HMTJksg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 1:18 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> pá 17. 5. 2024 v 18:02 odesílatel Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> napsal:
>> You've shown an inconsistency between the primary and standby with
>> respect to the heap tuple infomask bits related to freezing. It looks
>> like a FREEZE WAL record from the primary was never replayed on the
>> standby.
>
>
> It think is possible so broken tuples was created before upgrade from Postgres 15 to Postgres 16 - not too far before, so this bug can be side effect of upgrade
I half suspected something like that myself. Maybe the problem
happened *during* the upgrade, even.
There have been historical bugs affecting pg_upgrade and relfrozenxid.
Commit 74cf7d46 is one good example from only a few years ago.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jacob Burroughs | 2024-05-17 17:26:45 | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-05-17 17:18:17 | Re: broken tables on hot standby after migration on PostgreSQL 16 (3x times last month) |