Re: broken tables on hot standby after migration on PostgreSQL 16 (3x times last month)

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: broken tables on hot standby after migration on PostgreSQL 16 (3x times last month)
Date: 2024-05-17 17:25:21
Message-ID: CAH2-WznmVB78j_AYcoyDNDhMhR0gxRq34pyBMiDBbY0HMTJksg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 1:18 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> pá 17. 5. 2024 v 18:02 odesílatel Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> napsal:
>> You've shown an inconsistency between the primary and standby with
>> respect to the heap tuple infomask bits related to freezing. It looks
>> like a FREEZE WAL record from the primary was never replayed on the
>> standby.
>
>
> It think is possible so broken tuples was created before upgrade from Postgres 15 to Postgres 16 - not too far before, so this bug can be side effect of upgrade

I half suspected something like that myself. Maybe the problem
happened *during* the upgrade, even.

There have been historical bugs affecting pg_upgrade and relfrozenxid.
Commit 74cf7d46 is one good example from only a few years ago.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Burroughs 2024-05-17 17:26:45 Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2024-05-17 17:18:17 Re: broken tables on hot standby after migration on PostgreSQL 16 (3x times last month)