| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Feng Tian <ftian(at)vitessedata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 |
| Date: | 2017-06-19 17:10:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WznkjNA0jO_Ac=to2tvGxSS9BmDQZpotXOUs5z9Py28RGQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've never been very happy with the performance of numeric, so I guess
> I'm a bit more optimistic about the chances of doing better. Aside
> from any computational optimizations, the fact that the datatype could
> be pass-by-value rather than a varlena might speed things up quite a
> bit in some cases.
What cases do you have in mind?
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-06-19 17:19:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql bug report - unexpected behavior of suppress_redundant_updates_trigger |
| Previous Message | Artus de benque | 2017-06-19 17:00:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql bug report - unexpected behavior of suppress_redundant_updates_trigger |