Re: Fixes for two separate bugs in nbtree VACUUM's page deletion

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: Fixes for two separate bugs in nbtree VACUUM's page deletion
Date: 2020-04-28 02:35:38
Message-ID: CAH2-Wznk8htg4jU4A7LeK4atO+iQDHfu0wp=PN0gTsdEXJj9rw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:02 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> I would like to backpatch both patches to all branches that have
> commit 857f9c36cda -- v11, v12, and master. The second issue isn't
> serious, but it seems worth keeping v11+ in sync in this area. Note
> that any backpatch theoretically creates an ABI break for callers of
> the _bt_pagedel() function.

I plan to commit both fixes, while backpatching to v11, v12 and the
master branch on Friday -- barring objections.

I'm almost sure that the ABI thing is a non-issue, but it would be
nice to get that seconded.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2020-04-28 02:44:04 Re: Proposing WITH ITERATIVE
Previous Message David Fetter 2020-04-28 02:32:34 Re: Proposing WITH ITERATIVE