| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 2017-03 Commitfest In Progress |
| Date: | 2017-03-04 07:03:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzne_rww9UAbZ8xnWTwCBpjFHJpEnBYN=fTx6UFHd1_6-A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Parallel tuplesort (originally submitted to CommitFest 2016-09)
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/13/690/
> Heikki and I have both done a little work to move this forward, but it
> needs a lot more attention than it has gotten. As I see it, this
> patch touches on two worlds: parallelism, and sorting.
I would like to remind anyone that is interested that I have
maintained an extensive Wiki page for this project, right up until
this week:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Parallel_External_Sort
> I don't mind
> reviewing the aspects of it that touch on whether parallelism is being
> done right, but I would like to have some help on the sorting end of
> things.
Your covering those aspects seems like something that would make this
an easier sell to another reviewer. Thanks!
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-03-04 07:09:39 | Re: Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-04 07:03:32 | Re: multivariate statistics (v24) |