Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1. (now: incremental sort)

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1. (now: incremental sort)
Date: 2020-07-31 01:52:10
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzne4=kbrQ2CEqzuLhh858TPedYs4oWV7yn3JGK97qrpqg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 6:40 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> Feel free to close it out. I'm satisfied that we've had a discussion about it.

Closed it out.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-07-31 01:59:53 Re: windows config.pl question
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-07-31 01:43:55 Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1. (now: incremental sort)