From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: AIX support - alignment issues |
Date: | 2022-07-02 18:54:16 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-WzndKXQQGh-7sCOTKL_87Kt918r0F2ztTAraeBCAC8v3OQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 11:34 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Personally I think we should just drop AIX. The amount of effort to keep it
> working is substantial due to being quite different from other unices ([2]), the is
> very outdated, the whole ecosystem is barely on lifesupport ([3]). And all of that
> for very little real world use.
I tend to agree about dropping AIX. But I wonder if there is an
argument against that proposal that doesn't rely on AIX being relevant
to at least one user. Has supporting AIX ever led to the discovery of
a bug that didn't just affect AIX? In other words, are AIX systems
peculiar in some particular way that clearly makes them more likely to
flush out a certain class of bugs? What is the best argument *against*
desupporting AIX that you know of?
Desupporting AIX doesn't mean that any AIX users will be left in the
lurch immediately. Obviously these users will be able to use a
supported version of Postgres for several more years.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-02 19:22:23 | Re: AIX support - alignment issues |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-02 18:53:34 | Re: Probable memory leak with ECPG and AIX |