| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft |
| Date: | 2021-05-18 14:51:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzn_sZ17x4L40JuQ8VgdW-NrNfwL19HSUDx+qnZAHf3-=Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 7:44 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> As things stand, in this case I think it *should* be included, since the
> backpatched change isn't the same as the change to HEAD (removing the GUC).
> The git_changelog output might well be wrong in this case (or, arguably, the
> "remove the GUC entirely" should've been a separate master-only commit than the
> "make the GUC do nothing" commit).
I suppose that's true -- maybe it should be listed separately, because
the GUC is removed in 14 only.
> However, Peter indicated an intent to add a reloption to disable the vacuum
> optimization, so maybe the removal of the GUC could be documented at that time.
This is unrelated to the bypass indexes in VACUUM thing.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-05-18 14:53:45 | Re: allow specifying direct role membership in pg_hba.conf |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-05-18 14:44:09 | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft |