| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_amcheck contrib application |
| Date: | 2021-03-12 22:08:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WznT1C2q_iCK_FLeHWUBM0qks489DyUZHzLPQfJM8von2w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 1:43 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> There are some interesting failures in the test cases on the
> buildfarm.
I wonder if Andrew Dunstan (now CC'd) could configure his crake
buildfarm member to run pg_amcheck with the most expensive and
thorough options on the master branch (plus all new major version
branches going forward).
That would give us some degree of amcheck test coverage in the back
branches right away. It might even detect cross-version
inconsistencies. Or even pg_upgrade bugs.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-03-12 22:16:00 | Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-03-12 21:43:05 | Re: pg_amcheck contrib application |