From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Radoslav Nedyalkov <rnedyalkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: create index insist on 2 workers only |
Date: | 2020-04-25 02:03:20 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-WznLai5oddawf7tdqGo_5tZa_Z2DPwfsTLCjMgRNmGfDoQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 7:32 AM Radoslav Nedyalkov <rnedyalkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> We 're rebuilding a big table which has set parallel_workers = 6
> system has
> max_parallel_maintenance_workers | 6 | /var/lib/pgsql/11/data/postgresql.sumup.conf
> max_parallel_workers | 16 | /var/lib/pgsql/11/data/postgresql.sumup.conf
> max_parallel_workers_per_gather | 4 | /var/lib/pgsql/11/data/postgresql.sumup.conf
>
> Also session level on index restore there is
> set max_parallel_maintenance_workers = 6;
>
> Still we get only 2 parallel processes in a free of any other load system.
> It is postgres 11.7
Try increasing maintenance_work_mem from the default of 64MB. MWM
constrains the number of parallel workers used.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Browder | 2020-04-25 15:04:09 | Binary downloads and upgrading the host OS |
Previous Message | Ron | 2020-04-24 16:36:47 | Re: psql \copy |