Re: log_autovacuum in Postgres 14 -- ordering issue

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: log_autovacuum in Postgres 14 -- ordering issue
Date: 2021-08-27 18:57:19
Message-ID: CAH2-WznKkOd-L6nWgn+OcveYreRnOtJU8BAJn5rxU0wboueVgw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 10:28 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> I'll commit this in a day or two, backpatching to 14. Barring any objections.

Actually, we also need to make the corresponding lines for ANALYZE
follow the same convention -- those really should be consistent. As in
the attached revision.

I haven't tried to address the issue with "I/O timings:" that I just
brought to Stephen's attention. We can handle that question
separately.

--
Peter Geoghegan

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Reorder-log_autovacuum_min_duration-log-output.patch application/octet-stream 5.5 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-08-27 19:15:43 Re: Queries that should be canceled will get stuck on secure_write function
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-08-27 18:46:48 Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements?