Re: a verbose option for autovacuum

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Tommy Li <tommy(at)coffeemeetsbagel(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: a verbose option for autovacuum
Date: 2021-03-18 16:38:05
Message-ID: CAH2-WznDPih6PyKuTx22fkoFkcopniZ8y53sbORgb+t+vtjufg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 5:14 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Okay, I've updated the patch accordingly. If we add
> IndexBulkDeleteResult to LVRelStats I think we can remove
> IndexBulkDeleteResult function argument also from some other functions
> such as lazy_parallel_vacuum_indexes() and vacuum_indexes_leader().
> Please review the attached patch.

That seems much clearer.

Were you going to take care of this, Michael?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2021-03-18 16:39:06 Re: invalid data in file backup_label problem on windows
Previous Message David Steele 2021-03-18 16:36:09 Re: Implement <null treatment> for window functions