| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vitaly Burovoy <vitaly(dot)burovoy(at)gmail(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Jason Dusek <jason(dot)dusek(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SERIALIZABLE and INSERTs with multiple VALUES |
| Date: | 2016-10-13 01:32:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WznBS71udnzd=1jmOHXvF6PMiD2BXd+dok2o5G3F+ahMsQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> But yeah, the existing code raises false positive serialization
> failures under SERIALIZABLE, and that's visible in the isolation test
> I posted: there is actually a serial order of those transactions with
> the same result.
I was under the impression that false positives of this kind are
allowed by SSI. Why focus on this false positive scenario in
particular?
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Patrick B | 2016-10-13 02:00:42 | Re: Postgres UPGRADE from 9.2 to 9.4 |
| Previous Message | PHANIKUMAR G | 2016-10-13 01:25:45 | Re: postgres failed to start from services manager on windows 2008 r2 |