| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Hernández <aht(at)ongres(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration |
| Date: | 2021-02-12 19:34:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzn9GtSqYcZT+t_8Ogn_jXn0e3zhXtXjyNTnee42JyvZsg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:13 AM Matthias van de Meent
<boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree. I believe that Babelfish's efforts can be compared with the
> zedstore and zheap efforts: they require work in core before they can
> be integrated or added as an extension that could replace the normal
> heap tableam, and while core is being prepared we can discover what
> can and cannot be prepared in core for this new feature.
I see what you mean, but even that seems generous to me, since, as I
said, we don't have any Babelfish code to evaluate today. Whereas
Zedstore and zheap can actually be downloaded and tested.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Rofail | 2021-02-12 19:56:42 | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-02-12 19:31:22 | Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration |