Re: Logical replication in the same cluster

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical replication in the same cluster
Date: 2017-05-01 18:31:53
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzn7QhfCdLzWheJNDAjcNC9ZCd4bn=vCzrBcXdQP+DZkew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Doing catalog changes in recovery is frought with problems. Essentially
> requires starting one worker per database, before allowing access.

Do you think it's worth just covering the case where you get an error,
such as a duplicate violation? I imagine that that's the much more
common case.

--
Peter Geoghegan

VMware vCenter Server
https://www.vmware.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikael Kjellström 2017-05-01 18:34:32 Re: BuildFarm client release 4.19
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-05-01 18:25:08 Re: BuildFarm client release 4.19