Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash
Date: 2017-03-27 02:56:59
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzn5OOUv45-bwa2yqTn=swFKmqeP95dtdUmq1v3rCgpQEw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Like you, I also tend to suspect that people would be more likely to
> use RAID type technologies to stripe things like this for both
> bandwidth and space reasons these days. Tablespaces seem to make more
> sense as a way of separating different classes of storage
> (fast/expensive, slow/cheap etc), not as an IO or space striping
> technique.

I agree.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2017-03-27 02:59:31 Re: Time to drop old-style (V0) functions?
Previous Message David Rowley 2017-03-27 02:51:03 Re: Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique