From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PANIC in heap_delete during ALTER TABLE |
Date: | 2022-09-15 22:39:25 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzn2NUa9NOmtAqPVix0cNtcQtn6nu4rrCpETYAUQy0t2Dw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 3:25 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> heap_delete() lets go of its exclusive lock (but not pin) in a couple
> places (just like on master). But it looks like all the places that set
> PD_ALL_VISIBLE are doing so under a cleanup lock (unlike master), which
> means that it can't change for the duration of heap_delete().
>
> I'm hesitant to commit anything here if I can't repro the problem on
> 13. I must be missing something.
What about Hot Standby? There was never a rule that said that we had
to have a cleanup lock to set PD_ALL_VISIBLE during original execution
(or in recovery), even before Postgres 14. I believe that Postgres 14
was the first version to do it without a cleanup lock during original
execution. But it wasn't the first version to do it during recovery.
Based on a quick look just now: the heap_xlog_visible() REDO routine
is processed as an independent atomic action on replicas. It doesn't
require a cleanup lock for this, and never has. It may or may not be
preceded by a prune operation for the same page (in any case obviously
we won't keep the cleanup lock after the prune REDO routine runs).
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Souvik Chatterjee | 2022-09-16 02:17:35 | Re: BUG #17615: Getting error while inserting records in the table: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xae |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2022-09-15 22:25:30 | Re: PANIC in heap_delete during ALTER TABLE |