Re: Rename ExtendedBufferWhat in 16?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rename ExtendedBufferWhat in 16?
Date: 2023-08-16 23:33:58
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzmv9jkAKgbApHNDX93-9nbsiAmfsjSRUEvcj73_0uAfyA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 4:32 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Does anyone else want to object? Restating the case in brief: commit
> 31966b15's naming is short-sighted and likely to lead to a
> proliferation of similar things or a renaming in later releases.

+1 to proceeding with this change.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-08-17 00:31:55 Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-08-16 23:31:27 Re: Rename ExtendedBufferWhat in 16?