From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Wood, Dan" <hexpert(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple |
Date: | 2017-09-28 21:15:15 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzmscv3DYDtOLjOSrzv9khMr4LR=UFGeFvOWBMG-U1DpyQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> Odd that it's not fixed. I guess there's still some more work to do
>> here ...
>
> Maybe what this means is that we need to do both Dan's initially
> proposed patch (or something related to it) apart from the fixes already
> pushed. IOW we need to put back some of the "tupkeep" business ...
We certainly do still see wrong answers to queries here:
postgres=# select ctid, xmin, xmax, * from t;
ctid | xmin | xmax | id | name | x
-------+-------+------+----+------+---
(0,1) | 21171 | 0 | 1 | 111 | 0
(0,7) | 21177 | 0 | 3 | 333 | 5
(2 rows)
postgres=# select * from t where id = 3;
id | name | x
----+------+---
3 | 333 | 5
(1 row)
postgres=# set enable_seqscan = off;
SET
postgres=# select * from t where id = 3;
id | name | x
----+------+---
(0 rows)
FWIW, I am reminded a little bit of the MultiXact/recovery bug I
reported way back in February of 2014 [1], which also had a HOT
interaction that caused index scans to give wrong answers, despite
more or less structurally sound indexes.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-09-28 21:39:59 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-09-28 20:20:30 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2017-09-28 21:31:51 | Re: [PATCH]make pg_rewind to not copy useless WAL files |
Previous Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2017-09-28 20:37:40 | Re: Surjective functional indexes |