From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15896: pg_upgrade from 10-or-earlier: TRAP: FailedAssertion(»!(metad->btm_version >= 3)« |
Date: | 2019-07-05 22:14:31 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzmj6pz98qZ6+Ro-=tHvyBJ6q0yxHV8QLOr6O0mE20Nw9Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 8:49 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > TRAP: FailedAssertion(»!(metad->btm_version >= 3)«, Datei:
> > »/build/postgresql-12-3URvLF/postgresql-12-12~beta2/build/../src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtpage.c«,
> > Zeile: 665)
>
> Seems that _bt_getrootheight is too optimistic about the metapage
> version it'll find. I suppose this could be handled by just not caching
> the metapage if it is of the old version ... or maybe by calling
> _bt_upgrademetapage().
The problem here predates v12 -- the call to _bt_cachemetadata() was
added to _bt_getrootheight() by commit 0a64b45152b, which went into
v11. My commit dd299df8189 added a new assertion that fails, but
that's just a symptom -- I changed the code in _bt_getrootheight() to
use a BTMetaPageData pointer to shared memory (i.e. a pointer to the
authoritative version), rather than using the newly-out-of-sync cached
version. It shouldn't be out-of-sync at all.
_bt_getrootheight() is mostly just something that exists for the
planner, so it has no business calling _bt_cachemetadata(), which will
"upgrade" the cached metadata image from version 2 to version 3 if it
happens to be on version 2. How can it be okay to upgrade the cached
version without also upgrading the on-disk/shared_buffers version?
This bug was hiding in plain sight.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-07-05 22:22:26 | Re: DISCARD TEMP results in "ERROR: cache lookup failed for type 0" |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-07-05 20:57:59 | Re: VACUUM FULL results in deadlock |