On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 1:32 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> Looking at the Git history, most of that paragraph is from a time
>> when autovacuum did not yet exist or was much less reliable than it
>> is now. So I suggest removing all that and pointing to autovacuum
>> instead, as done in the attached patch.
>
>
> Agred. A nightly vacuum is definitely not something for "most people" anymore.
+1.
The VACUUM documentation needs to be totally overhauled. This is a start.
--
Peter Geoghegan