| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table |
| Date: | 2017-06-08 20:28:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WzmYTLOw2H-ODOf0yCvO0xC3UEw0JQzGE8Pj+KbNrnqLQQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am not sure that I entirely agree with you on these points, but I
> don't want to debate it further and especially not on a public mailing
> list.
Fair enough.
> I'm going to spend some time over the next ~24 hours studying
> this thread and the patches and determining whether or not I'm willing
> to take responsibility for this patch.
Thank you.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2017-06-08 20:41:07 | Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-06-08 20:20:07 | Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table |