Re: Autovacuum behavior with rapid insert/delete 9.6

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Ted Filmore <pilepiper(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autovacuum behavior with rapid insert/delete 9.6
Date: 2018-03-29 23:07:43
Message-ID: CAH2-WzmXEUV5MjQ+iuMVe1Fh7_b9SaQ+uwdGGoe74xiU-OhY-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Ted Filmore <pilepiper(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> What I am really asking to confirm is after describing the situation is it
> reasonable to focus on (in the short term) tuning autovacuum to increase
> performance or does this not make sense given the workload and I should look
> elsewhere?

I would look into this suspected 9.5 regression, if that's possible:

https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=SfAKVMv1x9Jh19EJ8am8TZn9f-yECipS9HrrRqSswnA@mail.gmail.com

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2018-03-30 05:39:46 Re: dblink: could not send query: another command is already in progress
Previous Message Ted Filmore 2018-03-29 23:01:13 Autovacuum behavior with rapid insert/delete 9.6