| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kamigishi Rei <iijima(dot)yun(at)koumakan(dot)jp>, David Rowley <dgrowley(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17245: Index corruption involving deduplicated entries |
| Date: | 2021-10-28 22:26:52 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WzmVYGkPbNzKV+uqQ0Bgb9+=vQjk-iM0LW+sRLy6V6MN9Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 3:23 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> I find it slightly hard to believe that it's ZFS, simply because all 3
> complaints involve Postgres 14. And have a lot of common factors. For
> example, Herman also used foreign keys -- a lot of users never bother
> with them. And like Kamigishi Rei, Herman found that a REINDEX (or was
> it VACUUM FULL?) seemingly made the problem go away.
I mean it would seem to go away, only to return some time later.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-10-28 22:31:19 | Re: BUG #17245: Index corruption involving deduplicated entries |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-10-28 22:23:38 | Re: BUG #17245: Index corruption involving deduplicated entries |