Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.
Date: 2019-12-18 03:27:39
Message-ID: CAH2-WzmDtfc4FpE-tU=5n=k34tUSwOX498GKDcyYj-1G_fQvLQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:21 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> Still waiting for some review of the first patch, to get it out of the
> way. Anastasia?

I plan to commit this first patch [1] in the next day or two, barring
any objections.

It's clear that the nbtree "pin scan" VACUUM code is totally
unnecessary -- it really should have been fully removed by commit
3e4b7d87 back in 2016.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAH2-WzkWLRDzCaxsGvA_pZoaix_2AC9S6%3D-D6JMLkQYhqrJuEg%40mail.gmail.com#daed349a71ff9d7ac726cc0e3e01a436
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2019-12-18 04:36:17 Re: non-exclusive backup cleanup is mildly broken
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-12-18 03:19:44 Re: non-exclusive backup cleanup is mildly broken