Re: Connections hang indefinitely while taking a gin index's LWLock buffer_content lock(PG10.7)

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: chenhj <chjischj(at)163(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Connections hang indefinitely while taking a gin index's LWLock buffer_content lock(PG10.7)
Date: 2019-10-28 11:00:06
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzm9yScYof0J9SGepX02rUc_=iOF9kZ7Nyxa-sch6XwzTQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Alexander,

On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 7:04 PM Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> It tool me a lot of efforts to revise a concurrency section in README.
> I can't judge the result, but I probably did my best. I'd like to
> commit this patchset including both bug fixes and README update. But
> I'd like you to take a look on the README patch first.

Thank you for working on this.

I am flying back to the USA today, and will try to take a look at what
you came up with on the way. I will definitely have some feedback in
the next few days.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eugen Konkov 2019-10-28 11:39:38 Re: Proposition to use '==' as synonym for 'IS NOT DISTINCT FROM'
Previous Message rtorre 2019-10-28 09:09:44 Re: [Proposal] Arbitrary queries in postgres_fdw