| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Concurrency bug in amcheck |
| Date: | 2020-08-01 00:23:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzm87JWi92OgsuFaGcOb=R4tXR_joZQnqh56u9G1-PFCqA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:06 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 5:56 AM Alexander Korotkov
> <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > Thank you. 2nd patch is proposed for master and makes btree page
> > unlink remove all the items from the page being deleted.
>
> This looks good, but can we do the
> wal_consistency_checking/btree_mask() improvement, too?
You never got around to committing the second patch (or the
wal_consistency_checking stuff). Are you planning on picking it up
again?
I'm currently working on this bug fix from Michail Nikolaev:
https://postgr.es/m/CANtu0ohkR-evAWbpzJu54V8eCOtqjJyYp3PQ_SGoBTRGXWhWRw@mail.gmail.com
It would be nice if you could commit your second patch at around the
same time. It's related IMV.
Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-08-01 01:52:02 | Re: [PATCH] - Provide robust alternatives for replace_string |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-08-01 00:16:51 | Re: Comment simplehash/dynahash trade-offs |