From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Marina Polyakova <m(dot)polyakova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: master check fails on Windows Server 2008 |
Date: | 2018-02-20 01:21:12 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzm2FkneQHr7PzHuqQOLffcWNrrr2ExvH-RBEDA8U_6g5A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I see several things we could do about this:
>
> 1. Nothing; just say "sorry, we don't promise that the regression tests
> pass with no plan differences on nonstandard configurations". Given that
> --disable-float8-byval has hardly any real-world use, there is not a lot
> of downside to that.
That would make sense to me. It will also be necessary to formalize
what "nonstandard configuration" actually means if we go this way, of
course.
I believe that this is already true with "dynamic_shared_memory_type
== DSM_IMPL_NONE", so that's a second entry for the "nonstandard
configuration" list.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2018-02-20 01:47:39 | Typo in procarray.c |
Previous Message | Tsunakawa, Takayuki | 2018-02-20 01:09:37 | RE: Changing default value of wal_sync_method to open_datasync on Linux |