| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations |
| Date: | 2021-10-05 16:58:24 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzm02e=jAarpzeZGyK8JyXTvuHCfJ9KC5svosD72nROKrw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:41 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 7:10 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> > All of the underlying errors are cases that were clearly intended to
> > catch user error -- every single one. But apparently pg_amcheck is
> > incapable of error, by definition. Like HAL 9000.
> But this comment seems like mockery to me, and I don't like that.
It was certainly not a constructive way of getting my point across.
I apologize to Mark.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-10-05 17:03:44 | Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-10-05 16:41:27 | Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chapman Flack | 2021-10-05 16:59:38 | style for typedef of function that will be pointed to |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2021-10-05 16:56:33 | Re: Triage on old commitfest entries |